• troed@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    20 hours ago

    (not from the reporter but another guest covered in the story)

    charged $500 for vaping

    Yeah I think this is where Rest’s scam will come undone. While you could, in theory, claim you didn’t know your sensors could make faulty detection from hairdryer use, claiming to accurately be able to detect vaping will not survive a technical inquiry.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The crazy part to me is how the sensors company advertises as a selling point how much “smoking fine revenue” increases with their product

  • along_the_road@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    22 hours ago

    When travel reporter Zach Griff checked into The Pell, a JDV by Hyatt property in Rhode Island, he expected a relaxing stay with his wife and 9-month-old daughter. Unfortunately, he left on a sour note after the hotel charged him a $500 smoking fee following his stay.

    The problem? Griff says he’s never smoked a day in his life, let alone in a hotel room while staying there with his family.

    Griff, a senior reporter at The Points Guy, took his story public on social media after the hotel allegedly charged him the $500 fee based on readings from an air quality sensor. The sensor data was supplied by a third-party company called Rest, which claims hotels can easily collect fees from smoking events.

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Why did he pay? Or does the hotel have access to his card and can charge whatever they wish at will?

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Or does the hotel have access to his card and can charge whatever they wish at will?

        Of course they do. He had to use it to pay for his stay. Hotels don’t take cash.

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Isn’t that how the US does it?

        You give your credit card and they charge whatever they want. Always found that very weird in the US.

        • datavoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Restaurants are weird in the US too - why do you need to take my credit card to another room?

          • root@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Also weird that the restaurant pays the staff the absolute bare minimum and you need to supplement their income based on how much you order.

            • TehPers@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I’m not sure what’s confusing here. You pay exactly the price you see on the menu.

              (Plus ~10% tax based on which state and town/city you’re in. Plus ~15-20% tip. Plus sometimes a mantatory “gratuity” or whatever they’re calling it. Plus parking sometimes, unless you remember to validate it if the place supports that. Look it’s a lot of random things and even I can’t keep track of it anymore.)

          • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Wireless card readers are relatively new tech. I see them more and more as time goes on. New places usually give their waitstaff mobile readers, but there’s little motivation for older restaurants to upgrade their whole POS systems. POS systems have pretty long life expectancy. At least the older ones do.

  • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The article says they have a 9-month old, I’ve seen Dyson purifiers kick on due to baby powder in the air being a contaminant so that could also explain some of it.