• lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Get butthurt all you want about others not caring about & disagreeing with your point.

    Someone’s lack of sense to question unreliable information is entirely their fault. That’s no justification to violate a fundamental right.

    • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Not butthurt at all. I just accepted that I’m not discussing with someone capable of reading a comment beyond the first sentence of it. It’s fine tho, I’m not gonna explain it again just because you refuse to read the first comment.

        • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          “I’m a free speech absolutist who can’t read and believes that people shouldn’t be held responsible for what they say”.

          You’re not a critic, you just sound awfully like a maga snowflake yelling “but muh freedom!”.

          • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Let’s hold people responsible for what they say by violating freedom of speech.

            Little Jimmy injured himself trying to fly like Superman, so we must hold those media execs responsible by violating freedom of expression.

            Nah, shit argument: mere falsehoods do not incite imminent, unlawful harm. The time to discuss & criticize that speech before acting is unbounded. Any harm is the own doing & responsibility of someone failing to exercise reasonable sense of challenging unsound information & sources.