LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoCan anyone confirm?piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square164fedilinkarrow-up11.03Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageCan anyone confirm?piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square164fedilink
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39arrow-down6·2 months ago“Frantically”. Guys, stop adscribing human features to LLMs.
minus-squarejsomae@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down2·2 months agoYou sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down3·2 months agoThere’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoFunny. But that’s not how the market works.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoWell given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.
minus-squareNigelFrobisher@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoI dunno, anything less would be greenwashing their profligate power consumption.
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoThis again. sight
minus-squareKilgore Trout@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoIt would be great to provide a context too, since neither the title of the article is exhaustive about the content.
“Frantically”. Guys, stop adscribing human features to LLMs.
You sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
There’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
I’m sure OOP works for big AI. /s
big if true
Funny. But that’s not how the market works.
Well given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.
I dunno, anything less would be greenwashing their profligate power consumption.
This again. sight
It would be great to provide a context too, since neither the title of the article is exhaustive about the content.