• frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    The solution would be to provide a better service, but that would cut into their revenue.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again - blame Dodge (yes, that Dodge) for setting precedent that shareholder satisfaction legally comes before customer satisfaction.

      Source

    • ericheese@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “People in my country are trying to overthrow me because I suck at running the country so instead of doing it better I should just massacre them”

    • Jul (they/she)@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 hours ago

      It would reduce their short term revenue, but would improve their long-term revenue. Netflix used to have a great product, but they fiddled with it to make people watch only certain content that brings them more revenue. Same with Spotify. This then reduces the number of people willing to pay for the service and since there are few competitors that are better and/or have as much content they “piracy” is the only way to get the content you want for a reasonable price, with a good user experience.

      So short term these things improve revenue, but not as much as the revenue lost in the long term as people start to dislike the the poor experience or are unable to afford the higher prices. And people don’t want multiple services to have to check for new content all the time all with different poor Ux.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        And the board only cares about the next quarterly shareholder report.