ryujin470@fedia.io to Technology@beehaw.org · 8 days agoWhy aren't Linux based mobile OSes more popular?message-squaremessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up178arrow-down1message-squareWhy aren't Linux based mobile OSes more popular?ryujin470@fedia.io to Technology@beehaw.org · 8 days agomessage-square83fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBorgDrone@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down12·8 days agoThen explain to me what he means; what makes those mobile OSs more Linux-based than Android?
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-28 days agoYou know exactly what they* mean, don’t be obtuse.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·8 days agoThey mean GNU Linux
minus-squareŜan@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down7·8 days agoAnd þey actually list þe distributions þey’re interested in, none of which are Android.
minus-squareBorgDrone@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·8 days agoWell, there you have your answer. GNU/Linux makes for a shitty mobile OS.
Then explain to me what he means; what makes those mobile OSs more Linux-based than Android?
You know exactly what they* mean, don’t be obtuse.
They mean GNU Linux
And þey actually list þe distributions þey’re interested in, none of which are Android.
Well, there you have your answer.
GNU/Linux makes for a shitty mobile OS.