When you’re on the hunt for a new USB power adaptor, you may come across a few options with gallium nitride (GaN) technology. These charging bricks tend to be a bit expensive. But due to their reduced size and increased charging ability, a GaN charger may be your ideal purchase. It could even help you save money in the long run.

Most USB chargers use silicon semiconductors. Gallium nitride (GaN) is simply a power-efficient alternative to silicon. It allows a charger to achieve small size without a reduction in charging speed or thermal performance. A GaN charger is ideal for travelling or powering several high-wattage devices, such as laptops.

With more and more laptops charging through USB-C, and more phones making use of ultra-fast charging, you’ll start to notice that the silicon based chargers can get really hot during charging these devices.

Instead of buying a large silicon-based charger that only has two ports (with a shared throughput), you can buy a GaN charger with four, five, or even six high-speed charging ports.

#technology #chargers #GaN

  • joelthelion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This technology is cool. My only problem with it is that it’s going to incentivize even more power-hungry devices.

    I came across this post by the framework company a few days ago. They were boasting about their new 240W adapter. My question was: do we really want 240W laptops? Shouldn’t we make them smaller and more efficient instead?

    • CreativeTensors@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      IMO It’s relative

      My current laptop (edit: used for for studio apps, 3D modeling and rendering, and AI stuff) draws 240W but I’d say it’s an improvement over the 500W+ I would be drawing from a desktop that would have been in it’s place. The performance isn’t that competitive with desktop parts but the Perf/Watt definitely better.

      Most people are just going to be using their phones and tablets to browse the web and watch videos anyway, with the odd Ultrabook here and there which are still pretty good in a Perf/Watt sense.

      Jevons paradox does come to mind though.

    • Danacus@lemmy.vanoverloop.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a difference between consuming power to do stuff, and consuming power to charge. More power to charge = faster charging.

      • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They ship their MBP 16" with 140w power supplies, way higher than framework standard 60w charger. But I would guess it’s to be able to push full power and still charge the battery as fast as possible

        • nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, its pretty awesome to be able to charge stuff so fast, not to mention the M1 power consumption is tiny in the first place

          • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The biggest difference for me was the noise. Intel mbp fans spinning as soon as you open more than one application, going turbo if you compile anything and slowing down in the summer because of the heat.

            The only time I heard my M1 Mac fans is when I left the poor thing in direct sunlight outside

              • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I would Guess the air cannot sustain the performance as well as the pro. The battery is way bigger afaik Doing 16+h on a single battery charge is insane

                • nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Funny thing is that all the video reviewers review what they know, specifically “editing and rendering video content for their channel”.

                  The majority of users won’t even come close to the power usage that those guys require, demand and talk about.

                  Personally I do a lot of dev work but have never really run into thermal or performance problems on my MBP, and I suspect I’ll be fine on MBA as well.

    • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My thought is faster charging is a better reason for high wattage adapters. If your adapter can put out 240w and your laptop requires 70w to run then your battery would charge at 170w.

      • deo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d be interested to see how charging wattage and overall battery efficiency correlate. I’d expect there to be deminishing returns at some point, either in battery life or simply utilizing the input power less ideally. I can definitely get behind your point about faster charging being a solid use case, but I wonder what the upper limit for that is.

    • cerevant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How many ports are on that charger? I have a group that plays D&D using a VTT even when playing in person. A 240 watt charger could power 3 or 4 laptops, greatly reducing cable clutter.