• Crit@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Only because it’s not as important for them to keep it, they make a lot of money from other properties

      • DrPop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 年前

        It’s not just about money, but their image. Nintendo does the exact same thing with fan games that make $0.

        • pbjamm@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 年前

          I remember thinking that in 1998 too. It is too late to extend copyright for Steamboat Willie before it expires but that does not mean that corps like Disney won be fighting tooth and nail to extend it again in a few years when things they actually care about are expiring.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 年前

            Yeah, Mickey is definitely going to be something they’ll fight for in the future.

            I don’t find it probable they’ll succeed in convincing Congress that copyright life should be significantly greater than a century, since that’s nice and round and excessive, but we live in a corporation-first capitalist hellscape, so who knows?

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 年前

            They have, but they didn’t. And it’s not a foregone conclusion that they’d succeed. The longest copyright lifespan is currently 105 years from what I read, and I wonder if they could grease enough palms to convince people it should be longer than a century.

            We’re already in “excessively long” territory, and Congress still has a few reasonable people left, so I’m not convinced it would happen.