I think it’s pretty safe to say that the majority of us are here to avoid another corporate takeover of our preferred platforms. It would seem to me to be a tad irresponsible to allow Facebook into our space with open arms, allowing them to hoover up our data. I would love to keep using Lemmy.world, but will happily change instances if need be, and I feel many share that sentiment.
We should definitely block instances who insert ads into the content. However there is no evidence of threads.net doing something like this.
They could threaten to defederate from us so we should defederate from them? It makes no sense.
XMPP works great, I use it everyday. It doesn’t have to be popular, you only need to convince some of your friends to use it.
deleted by creator
I’m not sure I understand your question or why you think of those statements as being exclusive. I will try to answer separately.
The good thing about the Fediverse is that it isn’t a single service, but many federated ones. For any single instance, I think not defederating maximizes user freedom: A user who wants to interact with Threads can do so while a user that doesn’t want to see any content from Threads can block their domain.
I think it’s a little bit different from XMPP, in a sense that the Fediverse is a public space where I communicate with strangers, so I would like it to be popular at least among people with shared interests. For instant messaging I just need my friends there, but sure it would be easier if I didn’t have to show everyone how to create an XMPP address and what client to use.