downpunxx@lemmy.world to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agopreachlemmy.worldimagemessage-square408fedilinkarrow-up14.82Karrow-down1118
arrow-up14.7Karrow-down1imagepreachlemmy.worlddownpunxx@lemmy.world to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square408fedilink
minus-squarewowitsverycool@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40arrow-down3·1 year agoleave it up to chatgpt to equate legality with morality
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 year agoIt wasn’t instructed to formulate a moral defense, only a “defense”. Looks like it assumed that meant legal defense.
minus-squareAphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoChatGPT isn’t the right tool to ask questions about morality to anyway. You shouldn’t criticize it for failing to do something it was never designed for.
minus-squarewowitsverycool@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoi can if i waaaant to :3
minus-squareBeeko🐈@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoWhere did it equate legality and morality? Seems like it only gave legal facts.
leave it up to chatgpt to equate legality with morality
It wasn’t instructed to formulate a moral defense, only a “defense”. Looks like it assumed that meant legal defense.
ChatGPT isn’t the right tool to ask questions about morality to anyway. You shouldn’t criticize it for failing to do something it was never designed for.
i can if i waaaant to :3
Where did it equate legality and morality? Seems like it only gave legal facts.