• Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Claiming Tito was not a communist is getting kinda weird given the party was called the League of Communists of Yugoslavia

    • jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m personally closer to social democracy, but relatively on the left of that area, towards market socialism.

          • Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            SWCC is borderline fascist.

            Why do you say that? The electoral structure is almost identical to Cuba, although significantly larger in scale (due to obvious population differences), both systems were derivative of the USSR’s system.

            What unique structural feature makes you call one fascist over the other? I at least assume you don’t consider Cuba fascist. And what exactly is your take on the USSR? You are aware that the electoral system of Yugoslavia under Tito was also extremely similar right? I mention this since you implied you were fond of titoism.