cross-posted from: https://lemmy.fmhy.ml/post/726542

I have ~100 users downloaded ~1000 of my files in the last week alone. Music piracy is still alive and kicking. I encourage everyone to download and install SoulseekQT/Nicotine+/Seeker-Android and share whatever kind of music you have for everybody to download. Let’s bring back music piracy!

  • Briongloid@aussie.zoneEnglish
    5·
    1 year ago

    I use deemix for 320kbps, I originally had FLAC but as almost 100% of my listening is remote from my server I found 320 to be great.

    I’m no Hi-Fi listener, but YT rips suck.

    • Reborn Ash@lemdit.comEnglish
      4·
      1 year ago

      Is there something wrong with my ear that I can’t distinguish between music quality levels?

      • ApplePie@beehaw.orgEnglish
        7·
        1 year ago

        Not at all. For a lot of people, hi-fi audio is basically indistinguishable from “regular” audio, and you also need things like a DAC and good headphones to hear it. Bluetooth, as an example, can’t even play hi-fi audio at its full quality.

          • Ilandar@aussie.zoneEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            There is definitely something wrong with your ears if you can’t differentiate between lossless and low quality YouTube rips.

              • Reborn Ash@lemdit.comEnglish
                1·
                1 year ago

                Just, what do I have to pay attention for? It doesn’t seem like the audio has chirps, or noise (at least, disturbing one) usually. So, I don’t really get it.

                • DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyzEnglish
                  1·
                  1 year ago

                  There are a few key things that you’d notice between high quality and very low quality audio. Mostly, a loss of information, which would result in a muffled audio, a lack of crispy sounds and a loss of general clarity, as well as unpleasant distortion and other made-up noise at worst.

                  For 99.9% of people, it’s not really an mp3 vs wav/aiff comparison, but rather a kbps comparison. High quality mp3 (320kbps) is usually indistinguishable from lossless formats for most people.

                  For a good reasonable idea, compare 128kbps vs 320kbps at the bottom of this page and pay attention to the cymbals and other high-pitched sounds. You should notice that 128kbps sounds a bit more opaque, like it loses a lot of its spark, whereas 320 sounds crisp and clearer.

                  That being said, it’s not a huge difference unless you go below 128, and there’s no point in listening to wav and lossless files if you use Bluetooth, since Bluetooth hard-caps all your rates at 320kbps anyway. But I think it’s fairly noticeable anyway.

                  • Reborn Ash@lemdit.comEnglish
                    2·
                    1 year ago

                    yeah, ok, now this makes a lot more sense! I felt how the 128 had more snappy sounds, unlike the softer ones of 320 (think: the sound itself seems sharp in 128, unlike 320 and wav). you especially notice this around the 15 seconds mark (from 15:22 I believe).

                    But, yeah, it’s not very huge unless you go below 128 as you mentioned. Thanks for taking the time to write this!