How does it stack up against traditional package management and others like AUR and Nix?

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        You have the option to add the verified subset only, and you can always check permissions before starting an installed app, and it will not start before.

          • Pantherina@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Yeah with Snaps you also have unofficial packages, no apparmor at all and a mix of foss and nonfoss apps.

            But with flatpak these things are accessible and Flatseal is very commonly used.

            “Already perfect” vs. “Has the foundation to fix it easily” distros could easily allow to add the subset or improve the permission system.

            • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Do… Do you think I’m claiming snaps are better or something? I’m saying they’re much easier to use and I don’t give a shit about walled-garden BS. I don’t want my laptop to be like my phone. I want to install an application and I want it to work. Flatpaks are fine - they just made a really stupid decision about how to run them from the CLI which is 90% of the time where I launch programs from.

              • Pantherina@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Do you have a better approach for running from CLI? Apps need exact names I guess, and the system is exact.