• Grey Cadence @lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    …an appeals court ruled that CIMA, the acronym for the nonprofit that runs the park for the Peruvian government and administers the carbon credit project, had been improperly added as a co-defendant in the case. The appeals court threw out the ruling and with it the benefits ordered for the tribe, citing “the presence of insurmountable defects both in due process and in the motivation of the judicial decision."

    What a ridiculous reason to throw out a ruling.