Interesting history and analysis of SMTP’s history. How can we prevent fedi and other open protocols from suffering the same fates?

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    This isn’t about email or centralization, it’s a Bitcoin promo piece.

  • Quill0@lemmy.digitalfall.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yes there are alot of things on the internet back then. When it was an closed system of trust. But like any system that opens up new people are more then willing to take advantage of trust. Ergo we are in the zero trust era where everyone needs to prove. They are not a malicious actor before they will be listened to.

  • Nath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    How you can have an article talking about the history of email and it not be about Ray Tomlinson, I just don’t know. Wait - now I know: This person looked up the Wikipedia article on the smtp protocol and decided Mr. Postal was the pioneer of email.

    The conclusion is completely incorrect, also. About the only correct thing was that reputation is important for email transmission.

    No: you can’t just set up an smtp outbound server on your home server and expect the world to trust you. For good reason: we’ve had decades of trojans and viruses taking over home PCs and sending spam. Your ISP declares its “home” IP ranges, and those are immediately not trusted.

    That doesn’t mean you need to use a big email hosting provider. If you set up on a business IP range, configure your DNS Correctly with declared mx and spf records, the world will trust you (until you demonstrate that it can’t).

    Millions of businesses around the world do this.