The Civil Liability for Doxing Act, which takes effect on January 1, 2024, passed after a unanimous vote. It allows victims to recover damages and to request “a temporary restraining order, emergency order of protection, or preliminary or permanent injunction to restrain and prevent the disclosure or continued disclosure of a person’s personally identifiable information or sensitive personal information.”

It’s the first law of its kind in the Midwest, the Daily Herald reported, and is part of a push by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to pass similar laws at the state and federal levels. ADL’s Midwest regional director, David Goldenberg, told the Daily Herald that ADL has seen doxxing become “over the past few years” an effective way of “weaponizing” the Internet. ADL has helped similar laws pass in Maryland, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.

  • fear@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hmm, this makes me think of the tradition on certain parts of the internet where people publicly announce the name and crime of this convicted rapist. They’ll explain where he’s currently living, the name he’s trying to go by, and bars he was seen at. This activity seems to stem from the outrage at the excessive leniency he was shown by the judge, although could also be protecting other potential victims.

    I wonder if this kind of vigilante doxxing would fall under the scope of such a law, especially when his name is already in so many publications.

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The things you described are, under any interpretation, PII, and the rest reason they are being posted falls within the scope of the law.

      Even for convicted rapist Brock Turner.

      – edit: mobile keyboards stink

    • ArtZuron@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Since that information is supposed to be public knowledge and easily accessible, I don’t think it would fall under the law.

      That being said, I don’t exactly expect certain parts of the US to actually apply laws correctly.

    • magnetosphere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was an interesting article. Thanks for sharing it.

      That judge was trash. Although it turned out that recalling him had consequences, I don’t think those consequences are reason to tolerate unjust judges like him.