• FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    San Francisco’s police and fire departments have urged the CPUC to oppose the expansion – they say they’ve tallied 55 incidents where self-driving cars have got in the way of rescue operations in just the last six months. The incidents include running through yellow emergency tape, blocking firehouse driveways and refusing to move for first responders.

    I’d be curious to see how that compared to the number of idiot human drivers who got in the way and otherwise reacted incorrectly to emergency vehicles.

  • garrett@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stupid idea that’s clearly motivated by the city’s deference to their tech gentry. Self driving anything has too many questions and issues still. I’m also not inclined to table “well what about the problems with people driving?” That only tells me we need transit, not robo taxis.

    • TQuid@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ding ding ding! We have a safe mode of robot transit: trains. See, we know exactly where they will go because they run on rails. Literally.

      • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trains aren’t safe. They just expose you to different dangers, like airborne diseases, pickpocketing, and stabbing.

        • garrett@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I promise I’m not trying to make fun of you but this sounds a bit like a suburban person’s perception of the city rather than what the city is actually like. None of this is more common on a subway than anywhere else.

      • snowbell@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How am I supposed to sing “Oops I did it Again” at the top of my lungs on a train? I need a private booth for that.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Transit can only take you to a place along its route, and it takes forever to get there. Cars and taxis are popular for a reason.

      • garrett@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, because there’s zero investment in transit. We literally don’t have the resources to make a bunch of EV cars so we’re gonna have to invest in transit one way or another.

  • Rentlar@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just have them be overridden with a key like Elevators. Let policemen and other responders be able to drive, stop or direct them by inserting the fireman’s key.

    Or alternatively, just take full liberty and bash the autonomous vehicle out of the way. No key required.

    • oldGregg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hell yeah and then we can get a universal remote from the dank web and have free cars literally everywhere I’m down.

      • Rentlar@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t necessarily have to be a get-free-car feature. It could be limited to 20km/h or something if operated in control mode.

    • Seathru@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We already have the tech to let signal lights at intersections know emergency vehicles are approaching so they can direct traffic accordingly. No reason this couldn’t be adopted to autonomous vehicles.

      • superkret@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        OK, if the companies fielding the robot taxis pay for implementing those new systems entirely.
        Since their products, which they profit from, make those systems necessary in the first place.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Let policemen and other responders be able to drive, stop or direct them by inserting the fireman’s key.

      Then they can be remote-controlled by criminals to abduct people. That doesn’t seem wise.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    On Thursday, the California Public Utilities Commission, or CPUC, voted 3-1 to let self-driving car companies expand their programs and start charging passengers like taxis.

    San Francisco’s police and fire departments have urged the CPUC to oppose the expansion – they say they’ve tallied 55 incidents where self-driving cars have got in the way of rescue operations in just the last six months.

    “Our folks cannot be paying attention to an autonomous vehicle when we’ve got ladders to throw,” San Francisco Fire Chief Jeanine Nicholson said in a public meeting on Monday providing commissioners testimony before Thursday’s vote.

    “We have demonstrated our deep willingness and longtime commitment to work in partnership with California state, SF city and first responders,” said Waymo spokesperson Katherine Barna.

    In one of those episodes, captured on police body camera footage obtained by Mission Local, a driverless car approached the scene of a massive fire in a residential neighborhood and inched slowly toward the firehose as frustrated first responders did all they could to stop it.

    Several police officer and firefighter associations and unions in the Bay Area wrote letters to the CPUC urging the regulator to hold off on allowing the expansion of driverless car programs in San Francisco, according to Mission Local.