• Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    No, you said:

    I guess that puts to rest the “I wasn’t going to buy that game anyway…” nonsense.

    My point is that there are still people that were never going to buy the game outside that 20% of lost revenue.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      My point is that there are still people that were never going to buy the game outside that 20% of lost revenue.

      My point is, that doesn’t matter. Will there be people pirating games that never would have purchased otherwise? Absolutely. Any game is a good value for $0. But many people use this argument as some sort of mental gymnastics to justify pirating. I’m just saying, the OP is evidence that that argument is bullshit. Many many people will choose to pirate rather than paying for a game they want to play.

      • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Sure, but it doesn’t blow the statement out of the water. You would have to find out how many times a game was pirated, then compare that to the extra copies sold that make up that 20%. Plus, not everyone who pirates games says that.