mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 13 days agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1201arrow-down12
arrow-up1199arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 13 days agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·13 days agoHonestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
minus-squareTraister101@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up6·13 days agoNah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·13 days agoSure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.
Honestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
Nah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
Sure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.