In-display fingerprint sensors have become commonplace in virtually all Android smartphones, for better or for worse, and five years later…

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Sure, as conversation, i’ve heard of thieves face unlocking phones they just stole.

    Indeed running as sterile an every day phone as possible is another great security approach by reducing risk.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Yeah I don’t really care what a thief does with my phone after they brain me. It’s the skull damage which concerns me. My google account is locked down with a hardware key so there’s only so much damage they can do before I wipe the device. Unless I’m dead, in which case I guess it doesn’t matter. Also my wife knows how to handle this situation. I would strongly suggest investing in posthumous spouse security as early as possible.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Your last sentence is great.

        Regarding the prior stuff, that’s very “you specific”. There’s of course tons of caveats or gotchas to my broad statement, but it doesn’t make it untrue.

        Biometrics present a less secure access path to a device…

        • socsa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          My point is that they are separable threat profiles. If you are more concerned about your sketchy tinder date grabbing your lock screen password, biometrics are great. What I would love is a quick settings toggle for biometrics.