• comfy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    absolutely nothing in the Lemmy model protects communities from the admin of the instance where it was created to go full Elon

    I’d say the low cost of migration does, especially if user awareness remains high (and since most users are here over complaints of the APIs being restricted, I’d say there’s an above-average awareness). It’s pretty easy to clone a community onto another instance, and it would be trivial for users to migrate too.

    • interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      As you discovered when you tried to get your friends to use Signal instead of whatsapp it’s actually very hard to move people.

      Everyone was “yeah let’s leave Reddit the owner are evil and taking away our mobile apps”. Barely anyone did. It is not trivial to move a group of people.

      • comfy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        My point is that it’s very different from moving from WhatsApp to Signal, or from reddit to Lemmy.

        Let’s imagine on an instance, a community mod started flooding their /c/technology with ads and deleting any posts criticising them. And suppose the admins decide not to step in, saying it’s their community and their right to do that.

        How painful would it be for users to go from /c/technology over to /c/tech or /c/technology@other.site ? There is a far smaller barrier - it’s basically two clicks on their side to change their comm subscriptions, they don’t risk losing communication with friends or miss out on a larger site’s content feeds, or have to deal with ‘one more app’, they don’t have to learn a new tool, they just use a different community.