• BeanCounter@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I search way, way more than 300/month. I’m also not paying $10/month AND give my search history to a company that I made transaction with.

    • etrotta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      the 300/month is for the 5$ plan? possible “fair use”-like hidden limits aside, the 10$ sounds unlimited
      from their front page they claim that “We do not log or associate searches with an account”, and their privacy page is fairly detailed

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Businesses like this always end up veering towards changing privacy policies to the worse.

        And depending on your threat model, not even a good privacy policy is enough.

        • nephs@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What do you mean “like these”?

          Usually businesses changing privacy policies are the ones without a revenue model that need to figure it out somehow, and aim to IPO.

          10$/month way more revenue than they could be able to get with ads, and sure, let’s hope they don’t want to IPO, because that’s the root of all enshittification.

    • Kayn@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you more content with instead giving your search history to a company whose business model isn’t as transparent?