Here’s one example of this system in use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelandic_name

Edit - I realize I probably misunderstood the question. But as said in another comment, it’s just a swap if we’re not talking about patronymic/matronymic naming systems.

I think the biggest risk is social engineering the elderly anyway

Pretty much the same situation with any Finnish bank.

My phone is my bank credentials, no other way to authenticate.

Literally mythical man month

Add chocolate

Probably best to avoid systems with known deniable encryption methods, and keep your dummy data there. Then hide your secrets e.g. in deleted space on a drive, in the cloud, or a well-hidden micro-sd card. All have risks, maybe it’s best of all to not keep your secrets with you, and make sure they can’t be associated with you.

As referred in other comment, the counter counter is to just keep beating to get further keys/hidden data.

There are some cases involving plausible deniability where game theory tells you should beat the person until dead even if they give up their keys, since there might be more.

deleted by creator

🌎🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀

Modest proposal, disenfranchise all normies. Utopia awaits.

It’s getting dark

The only theft going on is the ongoing theft from the public domain, due to corruption of copyright law by special interests enabled by law for hire. Your analogy is irrelevant as the marginal cost of operating a park for an extra visitor is not zero.

I will gladly take a position of moral superiority, because copyright has evolved from a very limited monopoly, intended to encourage creativity while balancing public access, into a licence for corporations to seek rent.

So, call it stealing if you like, I will sleep well tonight regardless.

But stealing is not owning so QED

Bankruptcy court?

If your business model needs undercover advocates to fake grassroots legitimacy you may have a problem.

If buying is not owning, copying is not stealing. Simple as that.

One was destroyed by GM, the other belongs to Geely.