Be the change you want to see… I’m also here for a friend
Be the change you want to see… I’m also here for a friend
Apple Vision was made for the shits
I do see that since it’s Ubisoft, they could still push for games on the subscription service but in reality I could see the games being loaded up with micro transactions.
Or it could turn into a convoluted game demo service, where you can play a portion of a game then they hit you with a pay wall, and since you’ve already played X% of a game they could view it as more likely to buy.
I honestly don’t hate game pass, it’s great for trying games id never even consider buying and if I really like the game and it’s off of game pass I would purchase it. Or if you have a group of friends that like to hop between co-op games you can do that too.
Like the Yakuza game series they have all of them currently on game pass, but the new one won’t be and I’ll definitely be buying the game.
But if it gets to the point where Ubisoft goes and every studio starts making their own, I don’t think that will work if they don’t have the game catalogue to support it, that would mean Ubisoft could just start churning out horrible games to build their stupid catalogue.
Does this mean this olive oil is not virgin anymore
I’ll give OP a high five if he makes it through no nut November.
Dam, now everyone who steps in my car will go “Why is Danny Devito on your dash”
This is terrible but, out of curiosity how gay does someone have to be for it to be aggravated? Im thinking in like US law terms terms like…
Verbal Simple Aggravated
The only work around I can think of at 2am, is that tickets were ineligible for sale as to have access to original email presented/ID used for purchase.
This method would be very difficult to enforce as majority of people wouldn’t agree to it as it’s very aggressive unless it’s a 21+ show (in the US) where you have to show ID for entry.