They are not made of straw, either.

They’ve decided who their customers are, and it’s not you

Since FF is free - isn’t that a given?

For Windows 11, it would be an ad for Hitler instead of just a picture.

You are assuming here that I know what I want. What if there is no obviously correct answer, and even in the Everett branch that generates the optimal content for the file I’ll still think it can be improved and tell it to destroy the universe?

What if there is no correct answer?

I just use this:

#!/bin/bash

keep_generating=1
while [[ $keep_generating == 1 ]]; do
    dd if=/dev/random of=$1 bs=1 count=$2 status=none
    echo Contents of $1 are:
    cat $1
    echo
    read -p "Try generating again? " -s -n1 answer
    while true; do
        case $answer in
            [Yy] )
                echo
                break
                ;;
            [Nn] )
                keep_generating=0
                break
                ;;
            *)
        esac
        read -s -n1 answer
    done
done

I vote for “OF-Model/Simp”.

That’s your solution for everything!

Just entered it, with my Google credentials, even though I’m neither a woman nor an American. If they are going to track people who read it, let’s add as much garbage data as we can (to the tracking, not to the sheet)

This is Rust. You don’t need a safe word - safe is the default. You need an unsafe word instead.

What do you mean by “improving”? This alarming warning appears because Firefox requires permissions. Let us look at the permissions listed there:

1. “User device access”. From the docs, I’d say the browser needs it for rendering?
2. “Download folder read/write access”. This one is obvious - the files you download with your browser go there.
3. “Can access some specific files”. This one, I’ll admit, is a bit cryptic - what files does it need to access? But this one is on Flatpak for making the permission so general.

App permissions should not be about “this app cannot be trusted because it asks for scary scary permissions”. They should be about “take a look at the list of permissions the app requests and determine whether or not it make sense for such an app to need such permissions”.

Nearly every app should have a warning

No. If you put a warning on every app (except for the most trivial ones that don’t actually do anything useful) then the warnings mean nothing. The become something more than ass-covering legal(ish) BS.

Only if we bring back the dinosaurs. There are six movies (and counting!) explaining why this is not a good idea.

Humans. Go figure.

I’ll start using it after I migrate to Wayland.

What about pogo sticks?

That already fits with the chart - “commercial aviation” is “airlines” and “private planes” are “light aircraft”.

Do you have a cropped tattoo? Can we see it?

“XL bully dogs”? Have we stopped saying “pit bull” because of and I never got the memo?

You got it backwards. It’s not about the people - it’s about the principles! What do you think the US cherishes more - medicine or guns?