Care to clarify what is objectively bad? Like, an example

I bought a cat game where you need to find and click 100 of them! They had cute noises and every single cat was named!

I was pretty shook over one book I read, plunging me into sadness for about a week.
I listened at sad piano music and made many custom pictures with this website using the book (cover) themed art 😂

Survive the game with the highest notoriety/ lowest reputation, across all factions and parties within the game.

Oof. My sister did this in GTA. It was sooooo frustrating to watch at! 😂

Then there are stat reductions. Less HP/mana/armor etc. Or, alternatively, you can take a value from a stat and add it to another/other stats.

I once checked out the damages done by different bullets in the original DOOM and with the console I “traded” bullets for others based on those values.

Hehe. Some are more, some are less, and some for some peeps only😄

I haven’t tested these, but for ideation:

• Use the worst weapon/tool/car through the game
• Do not use stat points through the game
• Only stealth
• Only guns blazing
• Sleep when it’s night (unless you’re a night owl but then sleep during the day)
• Do chores in the game that a human needs to do in real life (spend time in the bathroom, pretend to shower, take a walk outside etc)
• Choose, do you handle the character’s movement or attacking. A friend/spouse does the other option
• Take off some extra brightness
• No potions/boosters/upgrades
• No fast traveling

So the fox is confused and fighting its own survival through battling its foe?

Cool.

No worries!

Nice that there are changes towards positivity as well!

Okay. Well, I never saw any indications of this.
The previous time I used Akinator maybe 1-2 months ago.

I’ve noticed that sometimes he gets very close quickly but then drifts away to other questions that seem less relevant. But I don’t mind this myself.
The excitement stays, whether he will guess what I think about or not - I don’t mind answering 60 questions or even 100.

Money?? I’ve never seen that happen, at least not on the computer browser. This is the first time I hear about this.

At this time of the year - see, how many things related to Halloween it can guess?

I think that anyone who wants to contribute somehow in a positive way to their society, environment or country, should get enough money to have their basic needs fulfilled. Being it full-time or part-time work, volunteering or just helping out random people from time to time (pick trash alone somewhere and stuff).

I don’t approve ending people’s lives because they create harm to others. Of course it’s a whole different thing when you compare a feared dictator who hates humankind versus someone who spends all their time trolling people out of their minds in the Internet just because of the lulz. But I don’t know, what would be a good solution in these or any other cases.

Yup…no matter how good a tool is, if there are no users to it, it might be as good as it never existed (unless if someone takes ideas from said tool and implements them to a user service, growing their quality, which is still better than nothing). Sad but true.

I don’t know myself. I just heard about it. Haven’t studied it at all.

It seems that this decentralized style starts to be a new trend?

First this Fediverse/Lemmy I heard about. Then The Matrix (messaging platform). And now these Mastodon & WreMin.

Well, if that prevents or slows down the corrupted law of enshittification, then I’m approving it!

Some folks enjoy reading articles. Some folks enjoy to watch, listen and read (captions) at the same time. Some folks rather ask around and learn through conversations.

I’ve understood that it’s generally easier to learn new things when you use many different channels (audio, imagery etc). To many people but not to all.