![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/1d01e6ed-d1a9-4708-b618-e309dca4d99d.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/2QNz7bkA1V.png)
I’d say it’s more that computers only enabled the opportunity for humans to invent the security problems that other humans now have to counter with better computer and human solutions.
I’d say it’s more that computers only enabled the opportunity for humans to invent the security problems that other humans now have to counter with better computer and human solutions.
Yeah, sure, bringing things back on prem where 90% of organizations do not have comparable resources in-house to manage and secure them, as opposed to leveraging a cloud provider and properly maintaining the shared responsibility model is going to “set us free”.
Right? That’s like giving your age in days. “Oh, I’m a little more than 15,000 days old.”
The problem is that many peoples’ opinions tend to be ill informed, irrational, and stupid.
(I know this post is a month old, but I just came across it.)
We deal with this by not dealing with it, so to speak. We keep the on-prem AD account disabled and just move it to a synced OU called “Terminated”, then strip all group memberships/permissions from it. Once we’ve held onto the shared mailbox for the required length of time, we then delete both the on-prem AD account and the shared mailbox.
When it comes to Samsung, look at their “Pro” TVs, which are intended for businesses to use for digital signage. I’ve never had to deal with any of the very few smart features it has popping up or annoying me in any way.
I’m no expert on picture quality but it looks damned good to me, and it’s supposedly built to run 24/7 and not burn out since as said it’s intended for digital signage.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C9G54G2X
https://www.samsung.com/us/business/displays/pro-tv/explore/
deleted by creator
This isn’t being kept 100% up to date it seems. Photos 247 A & B are actor Jay Johnston who was arrested, but the pictures haven’t been updated with the ARRESTED tag at the bottom.
Don’t get me wrong, a pihole is good to have for anyone who has the competency to set one up. They’re not the answer to stopping people from sharing AMP links, is all.
Because a pihole doesn’t stop people from sharing AMP links, it only prevents you from viewing them. So it’s probably not a good answer to give when someone recommends that other people not use AMP links.
Does having a pihole somehow stop people from posting AMP links?
mRemoteNG has always been my go-to. Supports multiple remote protocols, though I’ve typically only used it for SSH and RDP. Tabbed interface, save a list of endpoints with the connections configs, etc. SSH just runs an instance of putty within the program, so it’s pretty straightforward.
I don’t know, go ask him… seriously, we need contributors. :D
Ask and ye shall receive - https://lemmy.world/post/1336612
Ah, well then yeah he should have been more explicit, or simply not replied.
If the question asked was “do you agree to the contract?” and the farmer answered “👍”, then yeah I can see it. But if the question asked was “have you received the contract?”, then this ruling is bullshit. Unfortunately the article doesn’t have enough information either way.
While anything over 1:1 is ideal, I think we can agree that setting it to at least 1:1 is better than setting it to 0 as u/Riusaki suggested. While it is the bare minimum, it’s not in any sense leeching to give back as much as much as you’ve received.
Except you should set it to at least seed to a 1:1 ratio so that you’re giving back as much as you download.
“Good faith” = corporations screwing you
“Bad faith” = you screwing corporations
There, I’ve simplified it.