“we” as in absolutely not most people.
“we” as in absolutely not most people.
For simple PC unlocking etc. they are perfectly fine and improve security due to their far higher usability.
The same way 10 key files on 10 different locations combined with this and that are more secure than a simple 60 character password. But the simple password is far more practical, so far more secure overall since people actually use it.
Don’t forget the Chinese golf carts they use to send their soldiers to their death.
The birthing rates are only dropping, in 15 years all of those people will be to old to work but there are not nearly enough to replace them.
So how does it spread?
You also forgot the first o, kl_O_naki.
How can a news agency have that kind of power?
So many games now do not even have any way to effectively communicate, which I find even worse. I found so many good friends while gaming, all impossible in those games where you end up with random people game after game with no communication.
“after one attack” now that is thinking outside the box. I wonder why they build the iron dome.
Lemmy in a nutshell. Mostly a very specific group of people.
It would skew it even more to rich people. Since… you know… everyone else has to work.
Ah, got it, thank you. Now I just need a source of YouTube links to download on my phone :D
Yes, exactly, you can do both with Newpipe. So what is the advantage of this?
Ah so only rich people can ever be politicians as everyone else simply can’t afford it.
What is the advantage to Newpipe? On the PC I know why yt-dlp is king, but as an app?
So instead of letting them free they murder them?
What the actual fuck are you talking about. Hamas murders people all the fucking time, posting videos of their brutal murders etc. proudly online. IDF has no interest in killing hostages, it does not help them, it can only backfire.
This is the report where you got that picture from. On page 44 are the assumptions for storage costs: 100 to 400 MWh of storage, assuming they are charged and discharged 315 times per year (so eg. 31’500 MWh storage output per year for 100 MWh capacity). Those do not need to be 100% cycles, but given that a year has hardly more days than 315 and some days even see no production, they need to be cycled pretty much every day the sun is shining. Anyway, what is my point? We need more than a few hours of storage to make it work. But the more storage you have, the less you actually use it, making it disproportionaly more expensive. Note what they say:
Lithium-ion batteries remain the most cost competitive short-term (i.e., 2 – 4-hour) storage technology
We need more than 2 or 4 hours. A single night is already far longer than that. The shorter the storage duration, the cheaper it is. Of course this skewes the numbers. It is like calculating the storage cost of nuclear waste for only 2 years. Of course it looks better.
Blasts as in illegal firework I assume, given such a murky head line.