Firefox since v1.0.1 RC :)

Thunderbird

Thanks for your opinion.

Sharing release log is not all about what “I” find as interesting. It is rather a notification to all other users of the software that a list of new features or big fixes are now available.

Not all of us are actively tracking release cycle of tools we use.

Each of us have our own use cases. What I might find trivial, another person who frequent this forum might find really helpful.

If you are not interested in the same software or not intended to use it or not using it currently, feel free to skip the post.

The other day I posted another article[1] from linuxiac.com highlighting only important changes, and someone suggested[2] to post link to actual change log, instead of URL to 3rd party article.

Today you are asking the other way around :D

[1] https://linuxiac.com/truenas-25-10-open-source-nas-released-with-nvme-of-zfs-enhancements/ [2] https://lemmy.ml/comment/21935248

Particularly this: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/6285

Do you know if a similar report exists for Intel based CPUs?

Not sure about Fedora, but openSUSE Tumbleweed and Arch have this enabled for a while now: https://www.phoronix.com/news/openSUSE-TW-x86-64-v3-RPM

Miniflux - https://miniflux.app/

If that changes, Google might lean on them harder.

If you remember, at one time Firefox used to hold 30% of total browser market share, and it was pro-privacy organization back then as it is now.

Even at that time Google was not managed to influence their decision making process.

Firefox relies on Google for its funding, so any browser based on Gecko relies on Google

Google introduced Extension manifest v3 to effectively to kill/handicap AdBlock extensions.

Mozilla, though getting funding from Google to make google its default search engine, officially decided to keep supporting Manifest v2.

Adblockers are direct challenge to Alphabet’s ad revenue which is still their biggest cash cow.

That speaks a valume about how much control google has on Mozilla decision making process.

If you consider the core count in modern server grade CPUs, this makes sense.

Nate’s side of this story:

https://pointieststick.com/2025/09/16/a-few-corrections-about-the-transition-from-blue-systems-to-techpaladin

https://tailscale.com/ This is essentially a mesh Wireguard Tunnel connectivity that ensures only you can access your service remotely.

:D

Tailscale is going public, so I don’t really trust them anymore

Even if the source code is open?

In general, for self-hosting, we hardly rely on remote service/server. The whole idea of self-hosting is to shun dependency on external service/server, and run everything on your own hardware and network. So that every aspect of the service is in your control. I don’t think self-hosting comes with much risk, unless you make your service available on Internet.

On a side note: you can remotely access any service running on home network via Tailscale[1] / Cloudflare Tunnel. Your services are never exposed on Internet. Moreover, you don’t need to rely on Plex for that.

[1] https://tailscale.com/ [2] https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-one/connections/connect-networks/

Just a stupid question - Is self-hosting (and this forum) only applies to open source products?

UX is a subjective topic.