For .ca specifically: as long as you are a Canadian individual, or have a sufficient connection to Canada, or a Corp with a trademark registered in Canada then you are qualified to own that domain - but as to who is really checking I have no idea… CIRA complainants maybe?
Here’s some info about .world domains https://support.google.com/domains/answer/6300841?hl=en#zippy=%2Cterms-restrictions
TIL about Italy’s shunning of their past in contrast to the “collective guilt” felt by Germans after WWII
Italians embrace their cultural and gastronomic exports while shunning certain parts of their history - I wouldn’t say that’s racist… In fact I would call that humanizing
I wonder what their response would be to a bunch of lemmings outside the reach of Germany’s laws doing the same?
Always wanted a “personal” website but felt I wasn’t creative enough to create anything useful enough… Maybe a wiki was the best I could come up with
Care to share what you use the website for exactly?
This is so much better and more effective than throwing confetti at Wimbledon for attention
I remember once upon a time browsing the Microsoft game studios site and getting excited for the upcoming RTS releases
Yes dude (or dudette) exactly what I’m saying is that it can’t be proven one way or the other until “you have the possibility of some information being made public”.
I mean clearly there is a third option - being a knob and claiming you’re always right no matter what the facts say
The false dichotomy? Id argue that’s you not believing someone can be concerned about an issue that affects everyone (global issue) regardless of location… but okay
Edit: A regional issue being more pressing for countries in that region does not justify saying a global issue does not need attention
I’m just seeing you agree in different words?
If government is the only one with the knowledge then it can never be proven to those who are properly skeptical
TIL Ukrainian lives are only a European concern
I personally think it is worth investigating these allegations
And you hit the nail on the head about why an elected representative won’t say one way or the other unless it’s objectively proven or shown to be false - anything else doesn’t need a response. Further any rep who does claim the matter to have been solved, one way or the other, only opens themselves up to criticism for something they probably didn’t get into politics for in the first place.
When scientists and experts (plural) start getting involved then it’s interesting however, imo, your focus on government being the ultimate truth-finder is flawed
Fair enough - just adding to the idea having an upset army isn’t helpful for those in power
Russia just gave a 10% pay rise to the army
Not sure why the cultural differences between us and ‘ancient’ peoples is worldnews
What’s the reasonableness standard? (to me that’s just a standard of review in appeal courts)
Confused - how does not pirating hurt the company more? Wouldn’t it be the exact same outcome for the company (as when pirated) or is this kinda like when GoT was arguing their popularity is even bigger when you look at the number of people torrenting their episodes
I’ve always had the opinion that anyone who can’t handle those being free to love who they want must have repressed feelings - I don’t see why that should apply any different depending on what country you live or whether you grew up in a society where the first repressed person made the original rule