• 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 12th, 2022

help-circle
  • It’s a state enforcing a particular administrative jurisdiction.

    It’s state banning religious organization no matter how many rounds of mental gymnastic you do

    These are all Orthodox churches, literally the same denomination. The Ukrainian church declared its autocephaly so that it is not administratively dependent on the Moscow Patriarchate and that was recognized by the Ecumenical Patriarchate and others (eg the Church of Greece, the Patriarchate of Alexandria).

    This has nothing to do with the matter

    What this move does is Ukraine mandating that churches within its boundaries adhere to the autocephaly. It’s not banning anything, just returning canonical ownership of the physical infrastructure to the canonical administration.

    Gold medal at mental gymnastic. This is just setting up state supported religion and opressing those not adhering to it.

    This makes sense in the context of a war of national liberation, when the enemy is literally in a position to do propaganda by controlling those churches.

    Finally you say something with substance, unfortunately for you this substance jut offer a more or less valid reason for state opression, not making the opression disappear.

    Ultimately, this is more like confiscating Russian assets than restricting religious freedom.

    Oh damn, so having anything at all to do with Russia now justifies literally everything

    From the point of view of a believer, the only observed difference will be which particular patriarch is mentioned during mass, nothing else changes dogmatically.

    Sure, it’s only religion, known as least important and trivial issue ever. Read yourself again what you just wrote here.

    and these are all internally orthodox politics.

    It’s not when a state comes in and bans and confiscates. Afaik Ukraine is secular state, it does not have state religion so why it does everything to look like it have one.

    The Vatican commenting on it is as absurd

    I mean sure Vatican shouldn’t throw any stones when the topic is religious freedom, but again, it’s clear case of religious opression.

    as, say, the Egyptian Coptic church making pronouncements about the Pope’s dismissal of cardinal Burke

    Bizarre and missed comparison. More apt would be if Egyptian Coptic church expressed concern over US state banning and confistating US catholic church (or any other non-Coptic church in US).

    But then again, the Vatican not staying in their lane has been the original reason of the 1054 schism to begin with, so this isn’t that surprising.

    Good thing you mention 1000 years old history! Makes your erlier dismissal of any concern over the organisation and worldy manner of denomination even funnier and more detached from reality. I’m sure there was no issues with antipopes or friday prayer names ever, after all “nothing else changes dogmatically”














  • Larion Studios is still doing fine.

    Maybe, or maybe not.

    They’ve decided

    I don’t believe that, half of Baldur success was because it was Baldur and gained massive hype for that. Larian’s credit was delivering to that hype (mostly), but if you were following the development, literally the main fear from fanbase was precisely because it was Larian making that - Divinity 2 was very far from universal acclaim in the niche. And this here look extremely suspicous even if it was just about the next game, but no DLC, no expansions, not to mention that continuing the success is an 1st iron commandment in entire industry, nobody stops doing that unless there is no possibility.

    There’s a lot going inside we don’t know because no company would just release such turbulences publicly.