![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
❎Doubt.
❎Doubt.
This doesn’t mean anything, as it’s not actually overall net positive. It just makes for a nice headline. But it’s just that more energy than the late deposited into the pallet came out of it.
But more energy than to run the lasers or the entire facility? Far, far, far from it.
That’s the problem when people just invent words. Nobody knows what they mean.
Lithium is not hard to come by.
Cobalt is used sparingly in batteries or not at all. You know where it’s used a lot? Gasoline desulfurization. So your hybrid uses up a ton of Cobalt.
On the days that you do you can use fast chargers. People talk like it’s 10 years ago. Nowadays you can charge back to 80% in like half an hour.
Because one company has a rosy range algorithm you think hybrids are the ex to go?
What are “critical materials”?
What would be an acceptable range and charging time?
It’s not literal. But the idea is you plug it in in the evening, and in the morning you unplug it fully charged, which all told takes less than 30s of you having to do anything.
Uh the just world fallacy it’s strong in you.
Exactly! Who’s parents don’t have apartheid emerald mine money?!
I mean hardcore gay porn. Who wants pics of thots?
Dude, that was never a thing. Companies are run by humans. Humans are dumb.
Somebody is getting real desperate over there.
Pretty sure it’s intentional.
I mean it’s slightly better. The worst effect is still by cloud seeding at flight height. That doesn’t go away with hydrogen.
But to my understanding could even be turned into a beneficial effect otf you changed the flight height of planes, seeding clouds further down. But that makes them less efficient, which isn’t great for hydrogen.
So a better strategy might be to mandate lower flight height and e/bio fuels.