Shambling Shapes

“I’m pretty certain he has already publicly apologized though.”

Feel free to share evidence of the public apology, you seem to be remembering something no one else saw. All I’m seeing is him making excuses, no apology.

“the person touching me apologized”

Important part missing from this puzzle; any acknowledgment or apology from the leader of an organization sexually harassing women he has power over.

It’s the one listed in the article that I see in daily life. It also has a reputation of being progressive, with their advocacy for LGBT+ rights and support of Bernie Sanders.

Soooo, the company owning Ben & Jerry’s ice cream is continuing to operate in Russia because “exiting is not straightforward”. Bruh. You’re going to lose money in exchange for not supporting a murderous regime. It is straightforward.

I would be surprised if $30/hr is an increase. Since they already serve the food cafeteria style, their waitstaff can handle more tables at once than waitstaff in a more traditional restaurant model. $30/hr in tips in Denver isn’t really that much.

It was always more about smoothing out the dead/busy times for me. Don’t schedule me if I’m going to sit around doing nothing and not earning tips, but also don’t underschedule the busy times leaving me to handle too many tables and losing tips because the quality of my work drops. Maybe a flat $30/he will drive the restaurant to schedule more efficiently.

This one is going to require some poking around at other resources and summaries from legal minds greater than mine. I am baffled by the explanation laid out in this article.

This may be the most direct Catch-22 situation I’ve seen outside fiction novels, but with shitty stalkers. The stalker can’t be convicted unless he’s intending to threaten. He can’t be considered threatening if he doesn’t admit to being threatening. So as long as he says he didn’t mean to threaten, despite literally telling the victim to die, he can’t be convicted.