Kinda yes, kinda no. There have certainly been times, particularly after 9/11 and various crises, when demand dropped significantly.
There’s also airliners that just haven’t sold well. A340NG, A380, 747-8, 767-400, the MD-11, until recently the Cseries/A220. The A330neo has also not sold particularly well and you could probably get a slot within a year easily.
I’ll take ‘Violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act’.
Turning that instinct off when going through security screening, customs, or biosecurity is usually a good idea.
With software that misuses /tmp, I’m more worried about burning out my SSD endurance than running out of RAM.
Indeed, the US has a major lack of fixed-line competition and lack of regulation. Starlink doesn’t really help with that, at least in urban areas.
I’m not familiar with the wireless situation. You’re saying that there are significant coverage discrepancies to the point where many if not most consumers are choosing a carrier based on coverage, not pricing/plans? There’s always areas with unequal coverage but I didn’t think they were that common.
Here in NZ, the state funding for very rural 4G broadband (Rural Broadband Initiative 2 / RBI-2) went to the Rural Connectivity Group, setting up sites used and owned equally by all three providers, to reduce costs where capacity isn’t the constraint.
Starlink plugs the rural coverage gaps, but in urban areas it’s still more expensive than either conventional fixed-line connections or wireless (4G/5G) broadband. Even in rural areas, while it’s the best option, it’s rarely the cheapest, at least in the NZ market I’m familiar with.
It also doesn’t have the bandwidth per square kilometre/mile to serve urban areas well, and it’s probably never going to work in apartment buildings.
This is a funding/subsidisation issue, not so much a technical one. I imagine Starlink connections are eligible for the current subsidy, but in most cases it’s probably going to conventional DSL/cable/fibre/4G connections.
The screen turning off when it automatically locks is an added bonus; the priority is to be able to command the system to simultaneously lock and turn off the screen. You’re correct that the setting at zero seconds safely achieves that.
I’ve had other, more stupid uses for running commands, though I don’t think any are actively in use.
Taking actions on network reconfiguration, charge completion, and SMART failure are all things that spring to mind. It’s nice to be able to set those kinds of things in a GUI rather than putting them in /etc/something.d
What I want is not (just) that the screen turns off when the lock timer times out, but that I can push ‘lock’ or a key combination and have the system lock and the screen turn off immediately.
The new ‘when locked, turn off screen’ setting should help with this, but setting it too low will presumably make it hard to unlock.
For running backups, ‘after a period of inactivity’ could help.
It still seems like the removal of a useful feature.
I use it for turning off the screen when the screen is locked, allowing background tasks to continue.
It’s also useful to run things like backups when the system is more likely to be idle.
Aggregate bandwidth now rivals or slightly exceeds gigabit wired connections.
Where that aggregate bandwidth is shared amongst large numbers of users, bandwidth per user can suffer dramatically.
Low density areas may be fine, but cube farms are an issue especially when staff are doing data intensive or latency sensitive tasks.
If you’re giving employees docking stations for their laptops, running ethernet to those docking stations is a no-brainer.
Moving most of the traffic to wired connections frees up spectrum/bandwidth for situations that do need to be wireless.
The actual eruption happened in 2019. It was big news locally when it happened, and there has been a slow trickle of further reports like this one.
It wasn’t a particularly big eruption; the fact that people were on the rather small volcanic island when it erupted is what led to the deaths.
The efforts towards a prosecution have been long and slow because it’s probably going to be a real mess:
Adventure tourism including visiting active volcanoes is inherently dangerous.
Did the scientists get the volcano risk levels wrong?
Which entities should get criminal blame? Island owner, tour providers, tour transport providers (boats), and/or the various regulators?
It sounds like that’s all sorted and they’re into sentencing on those that were found guilty.
Secondhand stuff can be really cheap if you know where to look, but the drawbacks are usually power and noise.
I wouldn’t start worrying until 50k+ hours.
There should be a way to view SMART info and that includes an hour count.
Yeah, you can’t really say “we started the engines but #2 wouldn’t start, so we’re continuing to the destination on one engine”. Delaying/cancelling the flight due to a safety/maintenance issue is perfectly legitimate.
The issue is that after that, a) passengers are entitled to compensation depending on the delay, and b) you need to provide food/water/aircon or take the passengers back to the terminal.
Biggest question to me is why you need an IP in the first place?
The passenger volume, cost, and build-it-today claims are I think in line with theirs. The only outlier is the energy claim, which is so absurdly false that it falls into puffery (think ‘red bull gives you wings’) and is again believable.
It’s clear HSR costs, and infrastructure in general, are getting out of control in the English-speaking world. It’s not clear how to fix this, but moving from proven and understood technology to Muppet technology doesn’t seem to be a good option.
:(
Not sure if sarcastic…
Let me introduce you to ebm-pabst.
Plenty of modern rolling stock already has water cooled power electronics, oil-cooled transformers, and I’m sure there’s RGB passenger information displays.
They also laugh at your little 120/140/200mm fans.
I didn’t realise it was possible to hate every side of an argument this strongly.