For better usage: you don’t need to write it into console. Just write it in an array!

Oh interesting, technicalities like? I wrote to a bunch of politicians and I was assured that they rejected it on principle.

Maybe they lied to me. But why would they lie to me but not the general public? Maybe the EU is a bunch of politicians and they all have their own opinions.

“Europe… the guys that want backdoor into all encrypted communications” is a weird thing to say considering that every attempt of such a law failed because they didn’t have the majority.

“Europe… where a minority of politicians have continually failled to get a backdoor into all encrypted communications” would be far more accurate.

They usually don’t do it professionally.

As i understand it and what is interesting to me, is that they f… A programmer, not programmers and that exclusively and professionally.

A professional programmer f… wow that is a job?

Master was just always a bad name for it.

Flowcharts are where the tech debt starts tbf

Or your employer would invest some money in a proper tool for your job.

I don’t think it will take over. I think idiots will deploy ai everywhere and that will create systems that are fundamentally inhumane.

I mean more surveillance, more arbitrary “decisions” by opaque systems. Basically Oppression by lack of oversight and control.

If you need to pay for something, it is a huge red flag.

As someone who can read code, lol.

In a democracy, it is important that the election process is understandable and verifiable by a layman. But how many people actually go to verify their elections? Barely anyone, so how and why should you trust the election??? Omg, the end is coming!!! Back in reality, enough people verify the elections and the fact that anyone can check creates the threat of detection. That makes elections generally safe.

Now with open source, a layman can’t understand it or verify it, but they don’t need to. They have to use software that seems to be heavily controlled by non laymans. Compared to closed source software, this is a huge improvement.

Why would your whole function be 1 service? That is bad for scalability! Your code is bad and the function will fail 50% of the time half way through anyway. By splitting up the your function in different services, you can scale the first half without having to scale the second half.

I think the more punchline phrasing for it:

Fascist = wants to have control over you.

Who is possessive in your “chicken’s egg”? Whose egg is it? The animal who laid the egg or the animal who lays in the egg?

I am fairly certain that chicken egg is chicken’s egg after a couple decade of human being lazy. We love to drop stuff in languages.

So chicken’s egg vs chicken’s egg.

That is a linguistical question. What does “chicken” in “chicken egg” mean? What is chicken? What is in the egg or who laid it?

I agree.

I think it is a side effect if it runs on a modern Os. But honestly who cares…

I have made experiences with annoying PHP devs and I don’t hate them.

My critic wasn’t towards rust devs or any devs of any language but towards idolization of a language instead of studying the nature of those languages the flaws and advantages and use the best tool available or attempting to create a better tool.

I see your perspective and I think you kinda miss my perspective which I am to blame for.

I don’t say there weren’t improvements. I am saying that given the uncertainty of “goodness”. Maybe we shouldn’t idolize it. You can appreciate the attempt of creating memory safe code through a programing language without thinking the bare metal code should be written in that language. You can like a typeless easy to write language like Js without thinking desktop app should be written in it. You can like the idea behind functional programming while believing that any application is in the end about side effects and therefore a purely functional application impossible.

You can approach the whole topic as an area of study and possible technological advances instead of a dogma.

There have been “improvements” but fundamentally in my perspective, these “improvements” could be revealed to be a mistake down the line.

Assembly has produced some insane pieces of software that couldn’t be produced like that with anything else.

Maybe types in programming languages are bad because they are kinda misleading as the computer doesn’t even give a shit about what is data and what is code.

Maybe big projects are just a bad idea in software development and any kind of dependency management is the wrong way.

I like modern languages, types and libraries are nice to have, but I am not the student of the future but of the past.