I think a hybrid approach is better, have a screenshot and a link to the source too. with a screenshot of a post on a whatever site I don’t not to figure out which privacy frontend is working right now every single time.
I think a hybrid approach is better, have a screenshot and a link to the source too. with a screenshot of a post on a whatever site I don’t not to figure out which privacy frontend is working right now every single time.
only if that feature wouldn’t have a massive memory leak… can’t update even to 10.9 because it crashes the whole system the first time it tries to rescan a library.
there’s an issue, and they have a hard time figuring out the problem.
you should be able to turn it up always, to some extent. it’s in the settings on web
a lot of people have a hard time to believe that facebook, google, microsoft, etc cannot be trusted, or even that they don’t have good intentions (anymore?)
I have recently discovered what was causing this to me for years. It was IP specific port bindings. Ports of a few containers were only bound for the LAN IP of the system, but if DHCP couldn’t obtain an IP until the Docker service started its startup, then those containers couldn’t be started at all, and Docker in it’s wisdom won’t bother with retrying.
The reasons to move my compose stacks to separate systemd services are counting.
deleted by creator
not necessarily if it shows that it has been that way for years. but yeah, it’s better now that it has the newer article
there are credible news outlets, that’s not the problem. the problem is that the propagandists are everywhere. they literally own the state TV channels, and most if not all regional newspapers and their online versions. a lot of people only watch/read these, and even more of them only believe what these tell
username checks out
Hopefully Mozilla employees will kick out their money sink CEO with double legs before the browser disappears for good.
To be fair this is a terminal file manager… only a certain kind of person will be interested in the first place,
that’s the point
and those people are likely to be more inclined to leave a star on GitHub.
I don’t see that connection. But you know what, here is an example.
Broot is a similar program. It has been there for longer, has been loved by many, yet it has fewer stars.
If I would know more of those like this, I would probably have more examples.
yeah but I don’t want to use up 20 GB just for a single project. It’s not like my hard drive is 80% free. more like 10% free, even though it’s large, because I’m using it and I’m already selective on what I’m doing on it
I think it boils down to, java has a lot of ceremony, which is designed to improve stability. I think this makes code bases more complex, and gives it the reputation it has.
I’m not a java programmer, but I like it more because python and js projects are often very messy
I doubt that amount of stars can be achieved naturally in this short time, especially from a developer previously unknown.
the program is certainly not used by likehappy common people, this would seem complicated and scare them away
maybe a wireguard network is the way to go then, of course without being configured as the default destination for everything. there IPs are always fixed, but at that point you don’t even need a firewall
and in modern days we don’t rly have hard disk limitation
well if you are a corporation, that’s true. Otherwise, not much
i still don’t understand. is it easier in python or JS to make getters and setters? with python my experience has been the opposite, with the decorator based solution in mind.
or if the problem is that they exist, as an option to be used, why is that a problem? they can be implemented in any other language, and it can be useful.
then yeah, you should check for nulls. just like for None’s in python, or if you have the correct type at all, because if it’s entirely different but ends up having a function or variable with the same name then who knows what happens.
then in javascript besides null, you also have undefined and NaN!
i still don’t understand. is it easier in python or JS to make getters and setters? with python my experience has been the opposite, with the decorator based solution in mind.
or if the problem is that they exist, as an option to be used, why is that a problem? they can be implemented in any other language, and it can be useful.
then yeah, you should check for nulls. just like for None’s in python, or if you have the correct type at all, because if it’s entirely different but ends up having a function or variable with the same name then who knows what happens.
then in javascript besides null, you also have undefined and NaN!
it gained 14k+ stars on github in a year (development started in 2023 july).
isn’t it a bit suspicious?
maybe it’s nothing, but this just caught my eye
would running nut-monitor in the VMs fit your use case?