I’m not as sure of that as you are, but I hope we get to find out soon.

No, did you read it? The US government also advocates for a two state solution, even if it isn’t by means you like they’re still aligned with you.

Edit to add: You are deflecting from the point I made also

Yes, basically the whole planet is aligned with you there. Is there an actual point that you have? Why not discuss these two different entities in terms of the unique problems within their societies? You can’t just say “Israel” if you disagree with someone, you have to use your words bub.

I mean, that ship has sailed though right? Israel will never agree to that unless it’s destroyed.

Israel is a different government and we should consider it as such… Unless you think there should be no Palestine? What is your point exactly?

Under this thought process, if Gaza isn’t Palestine, should the Palestinians’ state be recognized, what happens to Gaza? Is it absorbed into Israel? From what I can tell I don’t think this is gonna fly, almost anyone talking about this and the Gazans themselves don’t agree it seems

Do you honestly think the UN is that effective when it concerns international human rights? They approved a ceasefire in Gaza and nothing happened. There’s a two-year long genocide in Ukraine and the UN just let’s the Russian Ambassador carry on, and they’ve done nothing to stop them.

Things like food aid and whatnot they’re obviously helpful with, but if the League of Nations was toothless then the UN is wearing dentures in my mind lol

Can you link me some reading material about this?

we literally suffered 9/11 because of Israel

I’ve never once heard Israel come up in the story of 9/11

To be clear here, when I say “reason” I mean the fundamental capability humans have to use logic, rationality, and data to make decisions and inform their behaviors. If this is the understanding you had when you wrote your comment I suppose we just disagree fundamentally, and that’d be an exceptional take on the matter.

We can be both emotionally and logically intelligent creatures, the two aren’t mutually exclusive and reducing people to their base emotional responses takes away from their agency. In my experience people are typically much more reason-based in their decision-making, even people who are victims of the term “unreasonable woman”. We don’t go around doing things just because.

How far do you take this perspective? As a lefty that doesn’t sound like a very leftist take, rather it sort of completely eschews the principles of solidarity and reason-based argumentation…

I do agree that feminism is about helping women (and that’s great!), but should mothers not advocate for better mental health resources for their sons? Should I not advocate for better access to birth control for the women in my life because I’m male or for Ukrainian liberty because I’m not Ukrainian? Denying someone access to public discourse about a topic because they’re not suffering the consequences of the topic seems a bit silly to me. And of course, men do actually suffer under patriarchy, albeit in a different way than women obviously.