No clue, but they could use nice.

Oh. Right.

No, what you wrote sucks any way you slice it. You try again.

Borg is amazing but I don’t think it’s a good fit for your case.

Nothing. Like, absolutely nothing. It didn’t keep up with the times. I spent am untold amount of time on IRC, but the fact that you have to be online to have a chance to read messages just doesn’t jive with most people’s schedules anymore.

What are you sniffing? There’s no more pro censorship platform then Reddit. Lemmy at least keeps a mod log.

So like XMPP, SIP, Mumble, or Matrix without the chat part.

Ventrilo looks someone’s bad first open source project, but it’s proprietary. The audio quality must be orgasmic for people to use it.

That would regio explain with there are so few matrix servers out there compared to Lemmy or Mastodon.

They are one and the same.

I’m not following your logic here. Why would you want to get rid of ReVanced? It’s not a Google product any more than other alternative frontends, right?

Depends on your threat model. If you use secure DNS and https for the RSS feed, then these people would know your IP and the IP your connecting to:

• the DNS provider
• the RSS server
• your ISP/ VPN server

Both your ISP and VPN will know you’ve made a TCP connection to that server at a specified port, but that’s it. It’s trivial for them to reverse lookup the IP back into a name.

Only the RSS server will know the specific URL you’re visiting though.

Yeah, so it might fetch a slightly higher price. What does have to do with protecting the people potentially exposed by this project?

What’s your point?

Thank you!

That’s really good, but it suffers from having a “good enough” competitor built in. You’re already using an ad block that prevents loading ads, trackers and other nasties. Then you click Reader mode to get to a result that works well enough most of the time. A lot more convenient than handling finding a website to paste a link into, let alone self hosting a tool.

What this project needs is a browser extension to make it more convenient.

Broken image link for me 😕

Is it? Because war crimes are only defined in the context of a war, and I can’t see this scenario of an enemy combatant that is also citizen of the country it’s fighting and had no other citizenship. And even if it is, war crimes are only enforced after the war is over, on the losing side. Not on internal dealings of a country.

When I read your comment, the post already had a link. I guess they added after reading your comment.

I don’t think so. At least I couldn’t find anything on my settings app.