1·
1 year agodeleted by creator
- 0 Posts
- 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: November 11th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
It’s about being in the free software ecosystem, which is really a licensing issue.
Forcing people to contribute their modifications to software when they are editing free software ensures we’re never dependent on the decisions of one entity. This is what the GNU General Public License (GPL) is all about.
If we don’t like what someone did, we can take that part out and redistribute a better version that we can continue to modify. This might not matter to someone who doesn’t program, but it should.
You don’t have to be the one to get your hands dirty with code. Just being a user in the ecosystem opens you up to these benefits. Other people are going to take advantage of them, and you can just piggyback on their work.
I, personally, think it’s always just a matter of time before businesses make products worse by charging more/giving less. Look at Adobe. Look at Microsoft. Look at Apple. All of them want to lock people into endless subscriptions because they’re dependent on their ecosystem. What happens when Adobe decides they’re not charging enough for photoshop? They charge more, and everyone just has to deal with it. Same goes for Office. Same goes for Apple, they just do it the old-fashioned way by charging for the latest versions and making you buy new hardware.
Yeah, I’m trying to highlight how dirt cheap exports doesn’t necessarily mean dirt cheap products.
These guys get paid pennies, but shirts still cost dollars. Where does the rest go? Oh yeah.
Profits are up.
Doesn’t saying the same joke over and over again ever get old?
Better than eating them, redistribute their wealth to those who need it and make the ruling class the working class.
to keep the exports dirt cheap.
To maximize profit for the business owners*
Zionism, by definition, is religious nationalism.
It’s okay, I have my answer.
Your answer is “any death ratio is appropriate, but I know admitting it will make Israel look bad so I’m not going to say it.”
Are you saying Israel is justified in killing civilians because some Hamas may be among them?
What exactly is an appropriate civilian:militant death ratio in your mind?
They fuck up what you’re aiming at. In this case, mostly children.
Sorry if that was unclear.
Yeah, what you’re aiming at.
The majority of the injured were children and two are in critical condition as a result of sniper fire targeting the hospital, a Red Crescent statement said.
So they got injured running from sniper fire? Did the sniper pull off some James Bond shit and shoot a dangling object to fall on them?
What percentage of the children do you think were ‘accidentally’ shot by snipers?
Is it really an excuse to kill 10 times as many civilians, most of which are children?
Lol, are you joking?
So, I wonder, why are there 28 wounded, the majority of them children, in a hospital!, when a sniper is the weapon of choice???
Revenge.
That’s nice. Have fun on your campaign.
SteamOS has been built on Arch since version 3.
He’s pretending that Israel has no other options.
Might want to brush up on your reading comprehension if this is hard for you to understand.