Uhh. Cocaine is demonstrably more dangerous than amphetamines or opiates. Cocaine is cardiotoxic at any amount, and the damage is cumulative. Neither of the other two do that.

Half of the US is on rx amps daily, and they aren’t dying if heart attacks left and right.

I’d argue benzos should be higher than heroin for dependence. You can’t cold turkey a bad benzo addiction, but you can with heroin.

Thanks for the graphic, but many of those are laughably wrong. I guess it depends on their specific definitions. But for example solvents do irreversible damage with every use; meanwhile heroin is a drug available with a prescription (usually just in hospital use) and doesn’t do almost any long term damage on its own.

Cocaine is also cardiotoxic at any level

And yet another factor is that cocaine is cardiotoxic. You’re literally killing your heart with every use.

Source? Cutting cocaine almost always makes it safer, not more dangerous.

Ironically, cocaine would be safer if it were cut with those 3 drugs

There are plenty of “hard drugs” you can do with very little damage to your body. Cocaine is not one of them. In fact, it’s one of the worst things you can do for your heart.

But the dead Israeli babies DO want to exterminate the Palestinians? What a weird point you’re trying to make.

Uh, it’s a nice saying, but it’s not really that true. There are some defining differences in terrorists and fighting a war

Kinda weird that Hamas only wanted prisoners back who were convicted of violent crimes then?

Your understanding of international law is absolutely frightening. Go ask ChatGPT that question before you say it out loud again.

Wow this is a very delusional take. Hamas didn’t rampage into the “Settlements” of land that has been taken, they went deep into Israel. And I don’t think international law allows you to kill or capture civilians or children and hold them for ransom.

It blows my mind we’re in a time and place where you get downvoted for wanting terrorism to end.