![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Already cited two, but if you think “mow the lawn” is about Hamas, you’re already too far up the IDFs sphincter to likely care
Already cited two, but if you think “mow the lawn” is about Hamas, you’re already too far up the IDFs sphincter to likely care
Unbelievable that you can see all this carnage, deliberate use of non surgical engagement, calling Palestinians animals, calling leveling entire population centers “mowing the lawn”, and think they are fighting Hamas.
They know exactly what they’re doing, they’ll tell you themselves even.
But have you considered the pitched and complex conflict between [an advanced first world military] and [starving children]
Unfortunate thing is your mate is on par with the working knowledge of big venture capital swilling CEOs, CTOs, not to mention the other departments trying to get in on that sweet sweet prompt “magic”
As you say, responsible ML is an interpretable scalpel, not a black box hammer. These ocean boiling LLMs purporting to be a tool with universal generalism are such a categorical disaster–for ecology, for the health of the field, for public understanding.
It’s hard to go to work and have these conversations over and over again, to be honest it’s depressing, wearing me down. I suspect I’ll say no one too many times to “putting AI in our product” (by which they mean destroying simple well designed navigation by putting everything behind a chatbot search etc) and be let go.
Sadly it’s still ragingly popular in the tech start up / tech bro / LinkedIn cringe world.
My job is, among other things, ML related…I try to warn them off of this rhetoric all the time but they can’t stop being distracted by the shiny jingling keys.
Falling for “The IDF reports” is as bad as eating the onion at this point
All right wingers want for Christmas is increased suicidality of anyone unlike themselves
Here comes the footage of the IDF “finding” a few dozen bullets in his teddy bear
Dumb AND vile.
Got several people in this very post that would say that without the “/s”, so definitely needed unfortunately
I do respect the human involvement, respect them enough in fact to expect them to reflect on the ramifications of their actions/creation.
Some LinkedIn tech bro who’s trying to get enough venture capital to boil the oceans using some overwrought genAI bullshit to create electoral campaign material is also “a human”, but being willing to create that horrid output with its consequences leaves both the product and producer open to critique
Another feature working as designed
Removed by mod