Ideas in school are bad mmkay

No common folk is getting rich thanks to the stock market. Maybe richer if they’re lucky, but let’s not pretend it’s a tool for social mobility. It’s the opposite.

What about subsonic or funkwhale? I think I also tried a third one I’m forgetting

In my experience, TPU benefits from a higher first layer - it prefers being just “deposited” by the nozzle instead of slightly squished like for PLA and PETG. You can try raising your Z adjustment by 0.02 - 0.05mm and see if that makes it easier to remove.

If you work with transparent TPU and don’t want it to turn white, print slow and cold.

A tale as old as tea

The email protocols don’t natively support this, so yeah your best option is to embed or link to a webpage that becomes inaccessible after a set amount of time.

Same way as an HDMI cable enables piracy?

I don’t understand the eagerness of most people to go nuclear by adding potentially dangerous arguments when not required.

Use rmdir to remove a directory you expect to be empty, not rm -rf

MP3 metadata management has always been a pain in the ass. I can suggest Picard and Beets as useful tools, but there will always be some effort required to maintain properly

When some chud on YouTube in 2025 says “‘Woke’ is ruining gaming,” he means that awareness of systemic racism is ruining gaming. For him.

I don’t think it even goes that far tbh. Especially for less political, more gamer-type “conservatives”, it just means “the other side”, forcing so many girls (1) into their game. Maybe it’s just to deflect having to admit to being a misogynist.

And when an American politician calls himself “anti-woke”, he’s saying that he opposes the awareness of systemic racism. Not that he denies the existence of it, but that he’d prefer no one talk about it, so that it can continue.

Yes, exactly. No sane person would call themselves “anti-woke”. Unless they’re successful in subverting its meaning to be “those we’ll put in concentration camps”. Oh wait, that still wouldn’t make you sane.

It’s not about claiming the moral high ground, it’s just that you can’t have a word that can be used to mean its opposite, even if “sarcastically”. The word woke is just the past tense of wake, nothing else. It can be used to represent someone “waking up” from the hide-your-head-in-the-sand routine, or becomes able to see things from a new perspective. For the right, it doesn’t really mean anything, but they are pretty much using it as the new “sheeple”. Which doesn’t make any sense.

But the important thing is this: if someone is ridiculing people for wanting to be informed, involved in society, or generally just themselves, the only thing they’re actually insulting is their own intelligence and heart. If we let them have their use of woke as a generic mean insult, we lose sight of that.

More than swastikas, I think this case is closer to saying “you can use literally to mean figuratively because it’s common use” to which I also say no, fuck that.

But yes, swastikas forever symbolise Nazism. That doesn’t negate their original, positive meaning previously found in history, religion and culture. This is not an “achtually it’s ok to draw swastikas because they are actually good”. I’m just saying that context, and intent, matters. If you tattoo one on yourself as a westerner, you’re a Nazi - and it’s ok that everyone treats you like one. But should those original uses be stopped because it’s now “forever bad”?

Don’t let the alt-right dictate what “woke” means

deleted by creator

What gives them the authority to “plan” the lives of 1 million people halfway across the globe?

Which is also pointless - “legitimate interest” is basically them saying “i have a very good reason to access your data, as per GDPR, so I don’t need explicit consent”. Deselecting it has no effect, I think they only do that to make you lose time. The only way to avoid those companies using your data is to challenge them in court and show that they do not, in fact, have a legitimate interest. That’s their whole game

Yes I’m not disagreeing

deleted by creator

Isn’t he literally the only billionaire who has been donating a lot over the years?

But yes, fully agree. There’s no reason any person should be that rich. They’re cause and symptom of a fucked-up system

For once we get a good support request with a detailed description of the symptoms, attempted troubleshooting steps, and relevant context. Show some respect and read the thing before insulting OP’s intelligence

In this example your car is not an unstoppable force, it is just a “travelling” mass