Poorly phrased in the article if I understand correctly. It means it gave a correct positive diagnosis in patients who had already been diagnosed, with those percentages.
Yeah you’d think there’d be some mention of what it’s good for… seems to be a toy, reading between the lines of what the founder says
Yeah and their staff have been very dogged about promotion in language communities, including crowdsourcing the content (i.e. getting their users to produce it for free)
There was a level in Bubsy Bobcat called cheese wheels of doom… Prescient
It’s an appropriate designation in this case, and an appropriate rebuke to the law.
Whatever is touted as the primary use doesn’t matter as much as what anti-user features it enables.
Low barrier to entry if you’re not counting visibility. Yeah you can publish to the stores, but nobody will see it unless you are ordained by the gods at Apple and Google, or you buy eyeballs (and have the capital to do so.)