He correctly understood the context in which you wrote it, which was defending fascist-accelerationist non-voters and third-party voters.

He’ll try to stop/derail it if he can’t claim ownership of the results.

Trump never gave a shit about peace to begin with; he just wanted to fellate Putin.

This implies that Javascript will get moving in the correct direction once it finishes installing dependencies, but it’s just going to get fucked with incorrect behavior that doesn’t even have the courtesy to throw an actual error.

for no raisin

https://youtu.be/V3ZUhWuiQ20?t=22

(Sorry, I couldn’t resist)

My goddamn family doing that to me in suits would scare me.

Sure, if you’re willfully ignoring context. These were legislators wearing suits doing it in parliament to make a political point, not armed warriors doing it on a battlefield. The only ‘fear’ was entirely dishonest and performative, not real.

If you have 1 seat you have political power.

Well, until you conveniently get the longest suspension in history right as parliament is about to decide the budget, anyway.

I don’t understand; how is that relevant in any way to this discussion about the haka? Please explain specifically.

Do you believe that every party in every parliament in the world should be able to just stop parliament from working instead of trying to actually vote for laws/bills the way they think is right because they are sure that they are right and their voice aren’t being heard (even if they are minority in the said parliament or don’t have quorum)?

My legislative body has the filibuster and I think it has a useful function, so yes!

BTW, there’s no good reason whatsoever the NZ parliament couldn’t have resumed business after the haka. None at all.

The only reason they didn’t was because the leadership decided to feign performative fear and end the session in order to manufacture an excuse to punish the native legislators and exclude them from influencing the budget.

Removed by mod

Computing a nonsensical result is itself a failure. Continuing to run while avoiding giving an error in that case accomplishes nothing but to make the program harder to debug.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

The owner’s car:

Sure, I could see that. But on the other hand, this is ostensibly a photo of a building that exists IRL, so clearly it can’t be topologically impossible in an Escher-esque way.

When I hear “Conde Nast” I think about that scandal with the Bon Appetit Youtube channel and how they were discriminating against their non-white chefs.

https://www.thewrap.com/bon-appetit-adam-rapoport-brownface/

Escher used a lot of repeating patterns. This is more like a Picasso.

Removed by mod

You came after me first. I’m just defending myself from your abusive attitude.

“If you don’t want responsibility, don’t take on responsibility” is not an unreasonable position. Cut your condescending crap.

What "my behavior?* Which “behavior?” Gently recommending that poVoq/Kris get some more help? 'Cause that’s the only thing I did! My other comment was directed at your stupid hot take, not him.

I don’t know what you think you’re bitching about, but whatever it is you misinterpreted it out of thin air.