MBFC rating for The Telegraph:
Factual Reporting: MIXED
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
Overall, we rate The Telegraph Right Biased based on story selection that strongly favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and some failed fact checks.
MBFC rating for The Guardian:
Factual Reporting: MIXED MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
Overall, we rate The Guardian… Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks over the last five years.
They go on to list 11 failed fact checks.
Keep it civil please, and engage in good faith.
Al Mayadeen is not Hezbollah funded, no matter how many conspiracies people try to make up.
Should I bring up all the genocide denial in your post history? Claims that “Hamas uses teenage soldiers extensively”? Do you still think most people in the World News community here “seem to not consider Israeli’s as human”?
No matter how many reports you use to try to hide genocide, the truth will still come out.
The factuality rating is the same as they’ve rated many other sources such as Huffington Post, MSNBC, Salon, Daily Beast, Boing Boing, etc. The ratings are fairly skewed.
Even your rating site says they’ve not failed any fact checks.
Biden’s doing in 3 years what Trump couldn’t do in 4: start a war with Iran that the military industrial complex has been salivating for
Gun manufacturers have special protection, specific legislation at the federal level singling them out to not be liable.
When I heard about the change to block unregistered users from even reading tweets, I wondered if it affected embeds too.
One of the few good things to come out of this mess if it stops news sites from writing articles that are little more than 6 tweet embeds back to back.
Rafah is pretty much the last place for people to go, that’s why 3/4ths of the population is there at this point. There aren’t any “safe zones”.