Marginal at best when everything is made elsewhere and requires fossil fuels for transport.

I think the alternative: copyright should be looser. It usually only benefits corporations and lawyers.

Though it would be naive to consider AI companies and ally in a goal to reduce copyright terms.

If it wasn’t for StarOffice/OpenOffice/LibreOffice Impress, is have thought a rename to Impress would be a good name.

I read this a few weeks ago about it.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

In what way?

I’m not on desktop so can’t inspect to see the img src.

But it’s possible for a url in img src to have a different response (ie, html) when it’s a direct navigation (ie new tab).

Presumably to disable that hot linking from other websites/apps. Especially if they use scrapers.

But yeah, bad ux.

I imagine that theoretical speed could only be used for drone planes.

Always been a fan of it being Hal Finney, regardless of any evidence. It’s poetic symmetry with losing both around the same time.

Local companies may have similar names to others that exist overseas.

To require them to be in a globally common non-regionalised pool of domain names is more likely to increase scam risks.

Should the various regional companies of the Vodafone brand be forced to have all their world wide customers sign in to a global parent organisation Vodafone.com? Is it not better for the regionally specific customer portal be vodafone.com.au and vodafone.co.uk?

How does the use of ccTLDs furthers harms against the countries?

Misread the headline as e-bikes.

Ten years ago sure, the days I’d suggest matrix instead.

An unlikely pairing, but one that matches my own tastes.

Heh, I joined a company that used 1Password. Loved it. I set up a personal account to replace my use of browser built in password management.

The company got acquired and the acquirer replaced it with their corporate solution, LastPass. Then the LP breach happened and they switched to Keeper. Still prefer 1Password.

Is it better than a helicopter?

That is, probably limited to comfort, price, operating costs, and fuel efficiency.

It’s an abundant resource curse; land is the resource that is wasted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse

They might try make them harder to skip.

Nah it’s still their concern too. They’re mostly just on the beneficial side of it.

Is that a picture of a straw man?