![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
So, you dont think its something to discuss that everyone thinks its okay to start hating on Jewish people as a whole on here?
Or is that something to just ignore since I made a comparison?
So, you dont think its something to discuss that everyone thinks its okay to start hating on Jewish people as a whole on here?
Or is that something to just ignore since I made a comparison?
Its wild to me how many mfers are excited to start going in on “Jews”. Mfers just need to blanket hate I guess.
Wadyall saying about the Tigray or Sudan people?
I’m not going to bat for Meta/Facebook.
But in my personal opinion, users choice is best for the users. If Threads ultimately has more and better content(because let’s face it, we’ve all seen LINUX BEATS WINDOWS IN 10 GAME TESTS! 100 different times already), users who want that content will have to create an account with Meta to access it. I’d rather use my Lemmy account and access Meta through that.
but again, just my opinion which ultimately doesn’t matter.
But any way you want to compare Threads activity/uses to Lemmy’s… It’s pretty obvious that Threads is already way bigger which was the main point I’d imagine.
I like how amplified divisive content, misinformation and content moderation is the “legitimate” risks like it’s not already an issue here.
Pretty convenient it’s always a nameless generic bad guy for the actual bad guys though.
True.
But do you believe the actual people commiting the genocide and manipulating Facebook shouldn’t be held accountable for their actions?
It’s wild how we have simplified all modern complex issues to “it’s because of the (fill in the blank extremely popular bad guys)”
Guess it’s not worth thinking about the actual issues.
I’d imagine is because Myanmars situation is way more complicated than Facebook “undoubtedly caused a genocide”.
Seems like it’s getting trivialized to shit on Facebook
That’s a large portion of what’s here as well though…
Oh yeah, and I’d imagine if something like NATO decided to take that path forward in the future, it would probably be possible to beat Russia by killing Russians. I also imagine it would be relatively quick tbh.
But for humanities sake, I hope they can put together a better, more surgical way to remove the cancer from Russia.
While I agree with the sentiment, it’s not like “we” are trying to beat Russia, right? Ukraine is defending itself. I’d imagine the story would be a little different if the goal was to beat Russia(like a full effort), rather than defend Ukraine.
iMessage is one of the largest enablers of ostracization and teen bullying
This feels like a strange trivialization of teenage bullying thought up by someone who hasn’t been a teenager in a long timr.
Oh yeah, geopolitical is probably a better way to phrase it than “next level”.
That I agree with. I just felt like saying “nobody commits atrocities alone” removes some blame from some monsters out there that have done terrible shit.
I agree with the sentiment in context of these “next level” atrocities, for lack of better way to phrase it.
But I disagree with “No one person commits atrocities alone; there must be some backing”. Plenty of atrocities have happened because one person decided to be a dickhead
But really, it’s Mali. But they could have set it up that way for the Marxist Left thing
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/.ml#:~:text=ml is the Internet country,domain (ccTLD) for Mali.
I don’t think you understand how the Internet actually works, which is perfectly fine. Just weird to act so confidently giving silly advice
100% agree that Google is icky/morally corrupt.
But imo, having “don’t be evil” isn’t a great motto even if it was for the most moral company to ever exist. It’s just a really suspicious motto
What would you like the US to do in this situation?
Can you see whats been removed from a thread? Because at the time of my comment, there were quite a few comments I’m not seeing anymore