![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/2665e448-91d9-484d-919d-113c9715fc79.png)
That’s why live services games needs to incorporate micro transactions. The studio needs to have a constant revenue stream to maintain the development and the infrastructure cost.
That’s why live services game needs to end
That’s why live services games needs to incorporate micro transactions. The studio needs to have a constant revenue stream to maintain the development and the infrastructure cost.
That’s why live services game needs to end
How new is it? I’ve tried it a couple of months ago, and while it seems good, it was still too clunky
I think you need to disable Emulation Station on the list of parsers. I think it’s the first or second one.
The only reason that comes to mind to use x264 is to avoid transcoding for older clients. Also Firefox does not support HEVC so it always needa transcoding (at least on Jellyfin)
Sadly some clients (nvidia shield tv) does not support AV1 :( right now I’m encoding some AV1 content I have back to HEVC just because of that.
Love that they fixed the broken colors in desktop mode. It’s annoying when setting up emulators.
But i still have the charging light issue that should have been fixed in firmware 116 :(
So you mean that people that are on 3.5 preview will also receive the firmware update because it isn’t already in the 3.5?
Yeah it’s crazy. I don’t see what’s negative in having a GeForce Now app on Steam Deck, it’s always better to have choices.
Geforce Now is a cloud streaming app, you can already use Nvidia Gamestream on deck with moonlight.
This. This is the main reason i bought mine, to just isolate myself less and play near my wife while she watches TV.
This is sad to hear. What streaming app do you use? Steam Link or Moonlight? On my Shield TV moonlight is insanely better than steam link
Why does it suck? Asking because i wanted to buy a deck and i will definitely use it for streaming.
That’s my case, i’m a backend developer, more specialized in databases than websites, so i choose blazor because it was easy for me to become proficient fast and build nice and fast apps.
Also i usually build Enterprise apps, not public facing ones, so my target is still good for blazor. I know there are methods to scale better with blazor server (like using signalr on a separate service, outside the webapp).
Also we use DevExpress components, so basically all UI controls are done for me, so my dev time is even lower.
I’ll look at htmx, i’m curious at the tecnical differences and why it may be lighter than blazor.
The behaviour you described is very similar to what Blazor is. No frontend framework, and the DOM updates are rendered on the fly. I’m using it a lot and it’s very good.
I still have to play Starfield, but the most boring aspect for me of NMS was the writing. I’ve found it incredibly bad, so i guess starfield is better in that regard
The OLED one is.