It sells itself as an “outliner”. Which is bullet pointing everything. That’s actually how I take notes.
I though about other ways to parse it, but I couldn’t come up with anything.
It would be nice to have another mode for non full outliner documents, if you just want a markdown file, instead of an indexable list of blocks.
I like the diary format, and how the links between notes work. And the filtering and querying features. But mostly, I just keep notes for the days, and use checklists to capture future tasks, and then filter by “tasks only”.
I also write drafts for work documents, but didn’t figure how to tag them, or use much of the linking functionality there.
I migrated from obsidian to logseq and it’s “alright”.
I miss the clean md files from obsidian, but other than that, logseq is pretty powerful.
I also like notion, except its cloud based.
Unfortunately, “society” doesn’t control most of the value of anything. The monopolists do.
So the only really valuable kind of art is the art that can be used for speculation and money laundering.
It sparked from me wondering who’s this “they” OP was referencing to. Pretty much impossible to pinpoint.
And then, I associated that with “us vs them” rhetoric lines. I didn’t even accuse OP of anything.
I just wrote what that shower though made me think about. Maybe it was just another shower thought.
I agree wholeheartedly. :)
My commentary was an observation about “us vs them” way of reasoning, only.
I’m happy for your lemmy karma success!
I definitely do. Wikipedia is amazing.
But. Unfortunately, everything is political: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia-idUSN1642896020070816
My point wasn’t even judging Wikipedia. I just think “us vs them” is a horrible framework for reasoning.
You got 1000 upvotes. At that scale everything is a political statement. 🎉
Nazis, terrorists and/or communists. In abstract, no definition or distinction. Just don’t think about it too much.
“They” will fit one of these. But for sure, trust “us”, because we’re definitely not either of these.
Any argument based on “us vs them” is flawed by default.
He’s just a tool, though. The problem is capitalism, and in this instance, the expectation of intinite growth.
W
As if the government wasn’t controlled by probate lobbyists.
Blame goes to private interests being allowed to influence public decision makers, in my opinion. Infrastructure companies should not be for-profit companies.
They already do restrict you from using lemmy by charging full Internet price for it, and allowing special free data plans for Facebook.
Net neutrality matters.
I added an Al Jazeera video argument of a single state. It is not a defense of the zionist fundamentalist terrorists state.
It’s a defense of a multi ethnic state, run by the people for the people.
If nobody did anything maybe in 50 years the social indexes may improve by collective work of the people that live there, and know the right priorities, like Vietnam is recovering after the US simply stopped bombing the shit out of that land.
Or, you know, a solution that isn’t imposed by western colonialists, maybe? But by the sovereign people that inhabit the region?
https://www.youtube.com/live/Iir51O3JMqc
Otherwise, I agree with everything you said.
Pentagon. The security agency of the country vetoing ceasefire agreement in the UN security council, in favour of Israel attacks.
Independently of whom, exactly?
Petrol cars go brrrrrr
It would, but it’s not really objective since it was also established through military force. Either way, it’s allowing for one of peoples to use military strength and not another.
If its going away now, it isn’t quite long enough…