Always has been

Execution style.

They were murdered in the style of an execution.

They were executed.

They slip and fall on bullets of course

I mean…not nobody. Just not Israel, at least publicly. I think lots of people can clearly explain why they murdered him.

Sure you would say that, because you’re not an idiot. The Trump supporters will happily accept that the external revenue service collects money from external countries because they’re idiots.

Not to nit but we absolutely do not know the root cause of Alzheimer’s disease. Not that prions are good or anything.

Yes but it’s not a given considering a good chunk of US politicians defend Trump doing something like this on Jan 6

Both the majority party (which is the party of the president) and the opposition party are saying this is unconstitutional. So hopefully they have some actions they can take to curtail it.

If for nothing else I appreciate that they have a left handed cop for the symmetry

The NYT has always been a rag for the oligarchs. Nothing more, nothing less.

This was productive and I’m sure you convinced a whole lot of people

They’re suing him for copying scenes shot for shot from their movie after they told him explicitly not to

Sea of Thieves overall best. Hunt: Showdown a close second

No no you see, I have been assured that the Ukrainians are the real nazis. The proof? Well, the Russians said it. And, uh…hexbear! So…you know.

The risks of observing Israel commit war crimes. Props to them for staying and fuck the IDF for firing on the UN.

But they literally HAVE a fiduciary obligation. I agree with you that people use that as an excuse for heinous shit, but in this case they had a formal, legally binding offer. Musk was in breach of contract and they sued for specific performance or damages. Musk didn’t want to pay the damages. If they didn’t sue, Twitter would forfeit I think $1bn in damages and their stock would tank. Not suing would open the door for hostile investors to come in, pretend to buy, back out when they wanted to and time the stock movements. I get what you’re saying, but this is a case where if the board didn’t sue then Twitters shareholders pay for it.

You and I may agree that they never should have been in that place to begin with but that’s definitionally a fiduciary obligation

Ok? But that’s not what the Twitter board claimed. I agree with your premise but that isn’t what happened here.

No, I don’t think that’s true. Twitters board had to sue for specific performance because Musk backed out of a formal offer in the late stages for fabricated reasons. It’s not like it was “sue musk or go to jail” but their job as board members comes with a fiduciary obligation, and musk was paying 38% over the share price. Twitter is FAR from blameless but sueing musk isn’t a failing https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/07/14/twitter-vs-musk-the-complaint/

Not that they are blameless - far from it - but they had a fiduciary responsibility to pursue the deal because it was good for their shareholders

No no, surely the solution to this is a mechanical one