![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
He can decide, and his middle managers can decide, and you can also decide by choosing to shop from somewhere else.
He can decide, and his middle managers can decide, and you can also decide by choosing to shop from somewhere else.
On the other hand, if everyone in the world had your lifestyle the world would be much more wealthy and could make a lot of positive changes.
I think the answer is yes.
Amazon is very much not a monopoly. There are thousands of online retailers. There are also a lot of delivery services, no idea if there are thousands, but there’s a lot.
Correct, the vast majority of people don’t care.
Got a link to a good project of that type? I’ve been thinking about this recently.
Taylor Swift
That might be one reason why some warned against using it, but I definitely had teachers in middle school and high school that explicitly said not to use it because it could be changed by anyone including people who could be wrong or lying.
In a sense it is a monopoly, just a very narrow one. The first step to identifying a monopoly is identifying the relevant market, and that is quite hard to do, actually.
Pretty much a fact, with slightly fuzzy details.
I know in the US, if we taxed 100% of all US billionaire wealth, dropping their and their companies’ productivity to zero, you could fund the federal government for only like 7 months. You’d squander tons of production for comparatively little gain. The problem isn’t that we don’t tax the rich enough, the problem is that we waste money left and right.
Just canceling and not watching things is also an option. There’s so much stuff out there to do, you’ll probably never get bored.
The information is out there if you wanna find it. The truth is most people don’t care, though. That’s on us.